Legal Opinion

General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. Blersch

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1965PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJack Stanislaw, J.

This action for declaratory judgment was tried before the court without jury. Plaintiff General Accident (General Accident Fire and Life Assurance Corporation, Ltd.) seeks a determination of its rights and responsibilities to the defendants with respect to an automobile liability insurance policy issued to one of them (Reeber) and as to which the defendant Blersch is an additional insured. Blersch is being sued, in his capacity as additional insured, by Reeber and Bialy, the third defendant here. It is the claim of General Accident that Blersch failed to co-operate with it, thereby breaching…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Titus v. . Glens Falls Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BrownNew York Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance v. GrossNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. Olenick v. Government Employees InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1971
  3. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. BlerschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
  4. Bialy v. ReeberNew York Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Travelers Insurance v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API