Legal Opinion

Shalita v. American Motorists Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 28, 1943PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchenck, J.

This matter is submitted upon an agreed statement of facts pursuant to section 546 of the Civil Practice Act.

The defendant, American Motorists Insurance Company, by a policy issued October 21, 1939, effective for one year, agreed “ to pay on behalf of the insured [Oke Okeson] all sums which the insured shall become obligated to pay ” as a result of accident arising out of the operation of Okeson’s automobile. The defendant agreed as well to defend Okeson against suit reserving the right to investigate, negotiate and settle claims or suits. On February 6,1940, Okeson was involved in an…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Coleman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Rushing v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. Whitlatch v. . Fidelity and Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. SiefkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  5. Sackheim v. . PigueronNew York Court of Appeals · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Lauritano v. American Fidelity Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
  2. H. Y. Akers & Sons, Inc. v. St. Louis Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  3. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. TillmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Gallaway v. SchiedAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966
  5. SCW West LLC v. Westport InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API