Legal Opinion

Brothers v. Burt

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 25, 1970PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. The order denying the attorney’s motion to withdraw from representation of the insureds in this personal injury negligence action rested in an exercise of discretion in the management of the litigation (see Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, § 151). Consequently, in the absence of an abuse of discretion as a matter of law this court will not reverse such an order (id.). The instant order, far from resulting from an abuse of discretion, was based on the recognition, as the parties concede,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brooks v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Bialy v. ReeberNew York Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Schumm v. Long Island Lighting Co.Suffolk County District Court · 1968

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Ferdico v. ZweigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Globe Indemnity Co. v. Franklin Paving Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  3. Monaghan v. MeadeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. Cardot v. LuffWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Garcia v. ZitoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API