Legal Opinion

Brooks v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1956PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.

The attorneys of record for the New York City Housing Authority, a defendant in this action to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained by the plaintiff in *741the course of demolition work performed by his employer, move for an order permitting them to withdraw as such attorneys.

The movants were engaged as attorneys by a casualty company which had issued to the authority a contingent liability insurance policy in connection with the demolition work performed by plaintiff’s employer. They claim that at an examination before trial of one of the authority’s employees, he testified…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gracie Square Realty Corp. v. Choice Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. New York Casualty Co. v. BarbieriNew York Supreme Court · 1949

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brothers v. BurtNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. El Morro Food Distributors, Inc. v. W. M. Tynan & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1963
  3. Ganas v. TerryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
  4. Murphy v. SolomonNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Bialy v. ReeberNew York Supreme Court · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API