Ramsdell v. Krehmke
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON (R. L.), J., pro tem.
This is an appeal from a judgment for $700 broker’s commissions for procuring a customer, ready, willing, and able to purchase real property situated in Butte County, upon the terms specified. April 5, 1926, the appellant signed an exclusive ten-day contract to pay respondent five per cent commissions for the sale of lots 18 and 19 of Gridley Tract Number 5, situated in Butte County, for the sum of $14,000, upon the following terms: “$6900.00 down and the balance secured by mortgage and contract for five years to pay $1600.00 a year, with interest at 6 per cent…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mattingly v. PennieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Gunn v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Russell v. RammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Cone v. KeilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Pellaton v. BrunskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Shell Oil Co. v. KaplerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Lathrop v. GaugerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- C. O. Frick Co. v. BaetzelOhio Court of Appeals · 1942
- Walton v. HudsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1947
- Mitchell v. LocurtoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947