Legal Opinion

Ramsdell v. Krehmke

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 27, 1928No. Docket No. 3472PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON (R. L.), J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from a judgment for $700 broker’s commissions for procuring a customer, ready, willing, and able to purchase real property situated in Butte County, upon the terms specified. April 5, 1926, the appellant signed an exclusive ten-day contract to pay respondent five per cent commissions for the sale of lots 18 and 19 of Gridley Tract Number 5, situated in Butte County, for the sum of $14,000, upon the following terms: “$6900.00 down and the balance secured by mortgage and contract for five years to pay $1600.00 a year, with interest at 6 per cent…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mattingly v. PennieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Gunn v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Russell v. RammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Cone v. KeilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  5. Pellaton v. BrunskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shell Oil Co. v. KaplerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  2. Lathrop v. GaugerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. C. O. Frick Co. v. BaetzelOhio Court of Appeals · 1942
  4. Walton v. HudsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1947
  5. Mitchell v. LocurtoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API