Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Locurto

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 7, 1947No. Civ. 13345PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, doing business as Thos. L. Mitchell & Company, in the sum of two thousand two hundred fifty dollars as a real estate broker’s commission.

Plaintiff Mitchell, a licensed real estate broker, was employed by defendant December 3, 1945, in San Jose, California, under an authorization of sale providing in part: “In consideration of the services of Thos. L. Mitchell & Co. hereinafter called the agent, I hereby list with said agent, exclusively and irrevocably, for a period of 15 days from the date hereof, the following described property,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Mattingly v. PennieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Gunn v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Coulter v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Calmon v. SarrailleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Twogood v. MonnetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Christopher v. EvansNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Bumb v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. O'Banion v. ParadisoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Ziswasser v. Cole & Cowan, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Platte Valley Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. GrayNebraska Supreme Court · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API