Legal Opinion

Anderson v. State

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 25, 1943No. Civ. No. 3234PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

This action is in the nature of an action for inverse condemnation. It sought recovery for damages alleged to have been suffered by reason of the change of grade of the highway on which plaintiff’s property fronted. Plaintiff recovered judgment for $1,000.

Plaintiff’s property is situated about three quarters of a mile south of the southerly city limits of the city of San Bernardino. It lay on the west side of South E Street with a frontage of 191.11 feet. Plaintiff had on it a machine shop, garage and other smaller buildings in which he conducted his business.

Prior to March 2,1938, E Street…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Neel v. Mannings, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Ethel D. Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Brown v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. McCulloughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  2. Buena Park School District v. Metrim Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Valenta v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  4. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. LoganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. BondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API