Legal Opinion
People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Logan
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 27, 1961No. Civ. 12PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The state brought this proceeding in eminent
domain to acquire for frontage road purposes along a freeway the fee title to a parcel of real property owned by defendants Ralph Logan and Eunice Putnam Logan, and for the extinguishment of an easement owned by said defendants across adjacent land. The parties have designated the fee sought to be condemned as Parcel 9 and we adopt that designation.
Defendants are the owners of an irregularly shaped parcel of realty containing approximately 1.10 acres, located on the east side of Highway 99, approximately 1^4 miles south of the traffic interchange…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Gasoline Products Co. v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Nunneley v. Edgar HotelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- People v. AyonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Wolf v. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- SCI California Furneral Services, Inc. v. Five Bridges FoundationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. LagissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. ArthoferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. LundyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.