Legal Opinion
Marcoux-Norton v. Kmart Corp.
District Court, D. Vermont
Decided May 26, 1993No. Civ. A. 5:91-CV-308PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
BILLINGS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Christopher Marcoux-Norton brought suit against his former employer, Defendant Kmart Corporation (“Kmart”), claiming damages for wrongful discharge, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and breach of contract. Kmart moved for summary judgment. By leave of Magistrate Judge Jerome J. Niedermeier, Plaintiff amended his complaint to include counts for promissory estoppel, defamation, and tor-tious interference with contractual relations.
For the reasons set forth below, 1 Kmart’s motion for summary judgment on Plaintiff’s wrongful…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Joseph E. Dister v. The Continental Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Monge v. Beebe Rubber Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dillon v. Champion Jogbra, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2002
- Knelman v. Middlebury CollegeDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2012
- Rapp v. Jews for Jesus, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Woodstock Resort Corp. v. Scottsdale InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1996
- McKenny v. John v. Carr & Son, Inc.District Court, D. Vermont · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.