Legal Opinion
Woodstock Resort Corp. v. Scottsdale Insurance
District Court, D. Vermont
Decided May 16, 1996No. 2:95-cv-148PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SESSIONS, District Judge.
In this declaratory judgment action, Woodstock Resort Corporation (“Woodstock”) has asked this Court to declare that Scottsdale Insurance Company (“Scottsdale”) has a duty to defend it against a suit for wrongful termination by a former employee under the terms of a policy of insurance issued by Scottsdale to Woodstock. Both parties have moved for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, Scottsdale’s Motion for Summary Judgment (paper 2) is GRANTED, and Woodstock’s Motion for Summary Judgment (paper 15) is DENIED.
I. BACKGROUND
In considering…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Gallipo v. City of RutlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Applied Bolting Technology Products, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- Knutsen v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.District Court, D. Vermont · 2019
- Estate of Antonio v. PedersenDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2012
- GTM, Inc. v. Transcontinental InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1998
- Liberty Insurance Corporation v. LambDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021