Legal Opinion
Knelman v. Middlebury College
District Court, D. Vermont
Decided September 28, 2012No. Case No. 5:11-cv-123PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 27)
CHRISTINA REISS, Chief Judge.
This matter comes before the court on a motion for summary judgment filed by Defendants Middlebury College (“Middle-bury”) and William Beaney (“Coach Beaney”) with regard to all counts in Plaintiff James “Jak” Knelman’s complaint.1 (Doc. 27.) Plaintiff opposes summary judgment, arguing that genuine issues of material fact render summary judgment inappropriate.
Plaintiff is represented by Joseph W. Anthony, Esq., Mary L. Knoblauch, Esq., Kristin B. Heebner, Esq.,…
2Cases cited80 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Wood v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Faiaz v. Colgate UniversityDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2014
- Rolph v. Hobart & William Smith CollegesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2017
- Cain v. EsthetiqueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Grega v. PettengillDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2015
- Grubach v. Univ. of AkronOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.