Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided December 22, 2004No. Slip Op. 04-160; Court 02-00717PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RESTANI, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the court on plaintiff DaimlerChrysler Corporation’s motion to amend summons. Defendant United States opposes the motion on jurisdictional grounds.

BACKGROUND

For more than a decade plaintiff has attempted to have its entries of automobiles, parts of which were United States manufactured but painted in Mexico, reli-quidated so that such parts would receive duty free treatment under Harmonized Tariff System of the United States (“HTSUS”) item 9802.00.80. Plaintiff lost its first action following a trial because, essentially, this court and the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Stone & Downer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. United States v. Haggar Apparel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Schott Optical Glass, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  4. Daimlerchrysler Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  5. General Motors Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Daimlerchrysler Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  2. Nsk Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
  3. Container Store v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2016
  4. All Tools, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010
  5. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API