Legal Opinion
Nsk Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided February 15, 2008No. Consol. 06-00334PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARZILAY, Judge.
On December 10, 2007, this court granted Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction to suspend liquidation of their entries of ball bearings from the United Kingdom and Japan over the objection of Defendant-Intervenor, The Timken Company. See NSK Corp. v. United States, 2007 WL 4296636, 31 CIT-(CIT 2007) (not reported in F.Supp.). Now Plaintiff-Intervenors FAG Italia SpA, Schaeffler Group USA, Inc., Schaeffler KG, The Bar-den Corporation (U.K.), Ltd., and The Barden Corporation (collectively, “Schaef-fler”), move this court for a preliminary injunction to: (1)…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fmc Corporation and Monsanto Company v. The United States, and Rotem Fertilizers Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Gerald Metals, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Vinson v. Washington Gas Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Ceramica Regiomontana, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
- NMB Singapore Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Union Steel v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
- Nsk Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
- Tianjin Wanhua Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
- Fine Furniture (Shanghai) Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2016
- NEXTEEL Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.