Legal Opinion
Daimlerchrysler Corporation v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided March 18, 2004No. 03-1192PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PROST, Circuit Judge.
DaimlerChrysler Corporation (“Daimler-Chrysler”) appeals the decision of the United States Court of International Trade denying application of a partial duty exemption pursuant to subheading 9802.00.80 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”). DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. United States, 2002 WL 31421861, slip op. (Ct. Int’l Trade Oct. 25, 2002). In light of the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Haggar Apparel Co., 526 U.S. 380, 119 S.Ct. 1392, 143 L.Ed.2d 480 (1999) (“Haggar I ”), we conclude that the Court of International Trade erred in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE WEST, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Haggar Apparel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Stone Container Corporation, Stone Container International and Stone Container Savannah River Pulp & Paper, Plaintiffs-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Daimlerchrysler Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Barney O. Padgett v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2005
- Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Jonathan D. Fithian v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2010
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.