DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
RESTANI, Chief Judge:
This matter is before the court following final judgment, appeal therefrom, and a mandate from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirming the judgment of the court. The matter is res judicata, and no valid basis for reopening the case has been alleged. Accordingly, plaintiff DaimlerChrysler Corp.’s (“Plaintiff”) current motion to amend its summons is denied.
Facts
Plaintiff failed to include in its original summons in this action seven protests encompassing 403 entries, which it undoubtedly intended to include. The court…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Day v. McDonoughSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- United States v. BrockampSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. Stone & Downer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Daimlerchrysler Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.