Legal Opinion

Watlow Winona, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 12, 1993No. C4-92-668PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TOMLJANOVICH, Justice.

We are asked to decide whether the tax court properly concluded that Watlow Wi-nona was engaged in a unitary business with its parent company Watlow Electric and other Watlow subsidiaries, during tax years 1984 through 1987. There is substantial evidence in the record to support the tax court’s determination that the businesses were unitary during the tax years in question. Under the Minnesota Income Tax Statute and the United States Constitution, the taxpayer in this case had the burden of proving that it was not unitary with its owner and its owner’s other…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Quill Corp. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. HeitkampSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. BairSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. Department of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Butler Bros. v. McColgan, Franchise Tax CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hercules Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  2. Doe 175 ex rel. Doe 175 v. Columbia Heights School District, ISD No. 13Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  3. Schober v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  4. Amoco Corp. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  5. Marlow Timberland, LLC v. County of LakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API