Legal Opinion
Schober v. Commissioner of Revenue
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 4, 2010No. A09-717PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MAGNUSON, Chief Justice.
Relator Ronald Schober received a Notice of Change in Sales and Use Tax from respondent, the Commissioner of Revenue, in January 2006. The Commissioner assessed Schober for Minnesota sales tax collected in connection with Schober’s home repair and remodeling business, Timber Creek Renovation, which he did not remit to the state. The Commissioner also assessed use tax against Schober for failing to register his motor vehicle purchased in Minnesota in June 2000, despite having moved to Minnesota in November of 1999.
Schober appealed to the Minnesota Tax Court. The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Zip Sort, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- F-D Oil Co. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Acton Construction Co. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Soo Line Railroad v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Igel v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Doe 175 ex rel. Doe 175 v. Columbia Heights School District, ISD No. 13Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- Odunlade v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Schober v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Singer v. CommissionerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Marlow Timberland, LLC v. County of LakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.