Hercules Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BLATZ, Chief Justice.
This ease requires us to examine the boundary between business and nonbusiness income for the purpose of determining a nondomieiliary corporation’s income tax. In 1987, relator Hercules, Inc., a Delaware corporation that conducts business in Minnesota, sold its stock in Himont, Inc., a corporation that Hercules had helped to create four years earlier. 1 The sale resulted in a net capital gain of over $1.3 billion, and Hercules reported this gain as nonapportionable income on its 1987 Minnesota corporate tax return. The Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue issued a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Allied-Signal, Inc. Ex Rel. Bendix Corp. v. Director, Division of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- ASARCO Inc. v. Idaho State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Great Lakes Pipe Line Co. v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Gray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hercules Inc. v. Comptroller of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Hercules, Inc. v. Department of RevenueAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- In Re Appeal of the Kroger Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2000
- Amoco Corp. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Jim Hudson, in His Official Capacity as Secretary and Director of the Arkansas Department of Finance and Administration v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2024
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.