Legal Opinion

Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax Board

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 27, 1983No. 81-523PublishedCited by 558 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan

This is another appeal claiming that the application of a state taxing scheme violates the Due Process and Commerce Clauses of the Federal Constitution. California imposes a corporate franchise tax geared to income. In common with a large number of other States, it employs the “unitary busi*163ness” principle and formula apportionment in applying that tax to corporations doing business both inside and outside the State. Appellant is a Delaware corporation headquartered in Illinois and doing business in California and elsewhere. It also has a number of overseas subsidiaries incorporated in the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Wisconsin v. J. C. Penney Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Mobil Oil Corp. v. Commissioner of Taxes of Vt.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Japan Line, Ltd. v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. BairSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by558 opinions

  1. Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Crosby v. National Foreign Trade CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Jefferson Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Goldberg v. SweetSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. ScheinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

553 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API