Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax Board
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan
This is another appeal claiming that the application of a state taxing scheme violates the Due Process and Commerce Clauses of the Federal Constitution. California imposes a corporate franchise tax geared to income. In common with a large number of other States, it employs the “unitary busi*163ness” principle and formula apportionment in applying that tax to corporations doing business both inside and outside the State. Appellant is a Delaware corporation headquartered in Illinois and doing business in California and elsewhere. It also has a number of overseas subsidiaries incorporated in the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Wisconsin v. J. C. Penney Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. Commissioner of Taxes of Vt.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Japan Line, Ltd. v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. BairSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by558 opinions
- Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Crosby v. National Foreign Trade CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Jefferson Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Goldberg v. SweetSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. ScheinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
553 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.