Legal Opinion

Amoco Corp. v. Commissioner of Revenue

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 3, 2003No. C1-02-680, C3-02-681PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, Paul H., Justice.

Relators, Amoco Corporation and eight of its fully owned subsidiaries, challenge the Commissioner of Revenue’s computation of their corporate franchise taxes for the audit period from 1986 through 1990. During the audit period, relators filed Minnesota corporate franchise tax returns on a separate entity basis and paid aggregate corporate franchise taxes in the amount of $5,132,340. After conducting an audit of relators’ returns, the Commissioner concluded that Amoco Corporation was a unitary business engaged in exploration, production, refining, and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Butler Bros. v. McColgan, Franchise Tax CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Allied-Signal, Inc. Ex Rel. Bendix Corp. v. Director, Division of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. ASARCO Inc. v. Idaho State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Green Giant Co. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Billion v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  2. Sprint Spectrum LP v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  3. Sprint Spectrum LP v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API