Legal Opinion

Agostinho v. Fairbanks Clinic Partnership

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1991No. S-3724PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOORE, Justice.

This appeal concerns the admissibility of evidence of remedial repairs. The trial court granted a protective order barring admission of the appellant’s evidence pursuant to Alaska Evidence Rule 407. We conclude that the trial court could not properly determine the admissibility of the evidence without holding a pre-trial evidentia-ry hearing to determine whether it fell within an exception to Rule 407. We therefore reverse and remand the matter to the trial court for a new trial.

I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Joaquim V. Agostinho slipped and fell on a walkway outside of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dura Corp. v. HarnedAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Hutchins v. SchwartzAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Runkle v. Burlington NorthernMontana Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Linda Anderson, Derriel Anderson v. James E. Malloy, Peter Zes, Edward J. GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
  5. Adkins v. LesterAlaska Supreme Court · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Petrolane Inc. v. RoblesAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Robles v. Shoreside Petroleum, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Landers v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Fairbanks North Star Borough v. Lakeview Enterprises, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Dickerson v. WilliamsAlaska Supreme Court · 1998

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API