Legal Opinion

Petrolane Inc. v. Robles

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 2007No. S-11042PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Is a non-settling defendant tortfeasor entitled to offset against his liability to the plaintiff the amount of a settlement between the plaintiff and a settling defendant? We conclude that under a pure several Hability regime such as ours the non-settling defendant is entitled to an offset only to the extent of the settling defendant's share of the damages.

A jury found Petrolane Incorporated and Gary Robles, but not Shoreside Petroleum, liable for a propane tank explosion that severely injured Robles and Robert Gannaway. We remanded for a new trial on…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Duncan v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. McDermott, Inc. v. AmClydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Wells v. Tallahassee Mem. Med. CenterSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  4. State, Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. CarlsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Luth v. Rogers and Babler Construction CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1973

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Sowinski v. WalkerAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Beal v. BealAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Cameron v. CHANG-CRAFTAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Gold Dust Mines, Inc. v. Little Squaw Gold Mining Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State, Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. CarlsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2012

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API