Petrolane Inc. v. Robles
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARPENETI, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Is a non-settling defendant tortfeasor entitled to offset against his liability to the plaintiff the amount of a settlement between the plaintiff and a settling defendant? We conclude that under a pure several Hability regime such as ours the non-settling defendant is entitled to an offset only to the extent of the settling defendant's share of the damages.
A jury found Petrolane Incorporated and Gary Robles, but not Shoreside Petroleum, liable for a propane tank explosion that severely injured Robles and Robert Gannaway. We remanded for a new trial on…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Duncan v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
- McDermott, Inc. v. AmClydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Wells v. Tallahassee Mem. Med. CenterSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
- State, Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. CarlsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
- Luth v. Rogers and Babler Construction CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Sowinski v. WalkerAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
- Beal v. BealAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Cameron v. CHANG-CRAFTAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Gold Dust Mines, Inc. v. Little Squaw Gold Mining Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2012
- State, Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. CarlsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.