Legal Opinion

Runkle v. Burlington Northern

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1980No. 14629PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sheehy

Appeal is by the plaintiff from a judgment entered in the District Court, Nineteenth Judicial District, Lincoln County. For the reasons hereafter stated we reverse and remand for a new trial.

On March 24, 1976 at about 9:00 p.m., a Burlington Northern freight train and a jeep pickup driven by David Runkle collided at the Third Street crossing in Troy, Montana. Third Street is an asphalt roadway running generally in a north-south direction which crosses the Burlington Northern tracks running in an east-*291west direction. Runkle was driving south to north and the train was proceeding west to east.

Th…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Robinson v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1927
  2. DeElena v. Southern Pacific Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Ferguson v. Town Pump, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Tucker v. LombardoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Fauver v. WilkoskeMontana Supreme Court · 1949

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Rahmig v. Mosley MacHinery Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Betty Karl v. Burlington Northern Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
  3. Fisher v. Swift Transportation Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Richardson v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Faulconbridge v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2006

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API