BRET HARTE INN, INC v. City and County of San Francisco
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SULLIVAN, J.
Defendant City and County of San Francisco appeals from a judgment granting recovery of certain personal property taxes paid under protest. The major question before us is whether an assessor, in determining full cash value pursuant to relevant constitutional and statutory provisions, may do so by simply discounting acquisition cost by a uniform 50 percent “depreciation factor.” We conclude that he may not; we affirm the judgment. .
The facts, as substantially disclosed by the fully supported findings of the trial court, are as follows: Plaintiff, a California corporation,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- De Luz Homes, Inc. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- County of Sacramento v. HickmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Kaiser Co. v. ReidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Los Angeles Gas & Electric Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Elk Hills Power v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- Howard v. County of AmadorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Mission Housing Development Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- ITT World Communications, Inc v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Trailer Train Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.