Legal Opinion

City of Albany v. Black

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 25, 1926No. 8 Div. 792PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

Counts 1, 5, and 7 of the complaint, upon which the case went to the jury, sufficiently state a cause of ac tion, and are not subject to any of the grounds of demurrer interposed.

When an intentional obstruction of a public street is charged as the act of the municipality itself, the question of notice to the municipality of the existence of such an obstruction, as an element of liability to one injured thereby, is wholly immaterial. 28 Oye. p. 1387, § 3.

The material facts relating to the obstruction complained of are as follows:

In order to protect a sick man from the annoyance of passing…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Lawrenceburg v. LayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  2. Bradford v. Mayor of AnnistonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  3. Kearns v. Mobile L. & R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  4. Whitfield v. City of MeridianMississippi Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Anderson v. Mayor of WilmingtonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1899

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Morgan Hill Paving Co. v. FonvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. Carter v. FranklinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  3. City of Birmingham v. YoungSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  4. City of Birmingham v. CoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  5. City of Birmingham v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API