Legal Opinion

City of Birmingham v. Smith

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 27, 1941No. 6 Div. 693PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

Plaintiff’s intestate was killed on a Sunday morning between 9 and 9:30, traveling east in an automobile on First Avenue North, in Birmingham. This was a paved thoroughfare, very broad (50 feet) and much used in that manner. There was laid in the street a double line of street car tracks. The city had on the day before taken up the old- pavement, extending from the curb on the south side to near the track 14.9 feet, and along the curb east and west 9 feet, on the south side of the street, and had put down new concrete in that space, and piled up the old -stone taken out in a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. City of Birmingham v. CarleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  2. Cooper v. AgeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  3. Graves v. JohnsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1937
  4. City of Birmingham v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  5. Dorminey v. City of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Higginbotham v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  2. Jacks v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  3. City of Montgomery v. QuinnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  4. City of Birmingham v. YoungSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  5. Terrell v. Alabama Water Service Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1943

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API