City of Birmingham v. Cox
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The trial was had on counts 1 and 2 of the complaint as amended. Demurrers were overruled, the pleading was in short by consent, and the verdict was for plaintiff. There was motion for a new trial and the judgment was reduced and the motion overruled. The rulings on demurrer are assigned as error and duly urged for consideration.
It is established that negligence may be averred in a complaint in general terms, and when the allegation is of the acts constituting negligence relied upon, the pleading is demurrable, unless such acts, so averred, in themselves constitute actionable…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- B'ham Ry. L. & P. Co. v. BarrettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Jackson v. VaughnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Alabama Baptist Hospital Board v. CarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Johnson v. Birmingham Railway L. & P. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1907
- Buffalo Rock Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- City of Bessemer v. ClowdusSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Jacks v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
- Hand v. ButtsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
- Alabama Power Company v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.