Legal Opinion
Carter v. Franklin
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided April 15, 1937No. 4 Div. 877PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOULDIN, Justice.
Action for damages under the homicide statute, Code, § 5696.
The defendants were Martin Wunderlich Construction Company; Martin Wunderlich, individually; 'and Ivey Carter. There was verdict for plaintiff against the first-named defendants, and verdict for defendant Ivey Carter.
On motion by the unsuccessful defendants for a new trial, based on numerous grounds, plaintiff confessed error, and a new trial was granted.
Plaintiff moved for a new trial as against the successful defendant, Ivey Carter, upon the ground that the verdict was not supported by the evidence, was opposed to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. WilkesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Wright v. McCordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Mayer v. Thompson-Hutchison BuildIng Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1894
- Butman v. City of NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
- Jones v. CollinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Fontenot v. BramlettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Fireman's Fund Am. Ins. Co. v. ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Smith v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
- Miller v. MuscarelleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- American Southern Insurance Co. v. Dime Taxi Svc., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1963
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.