Legal Opinion

Morgan Hill Paving Co. v. Fonville

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 6, 1928No. 6 Div. 17PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

■ THOMAS, J.

The suit is for personal injuries to passenger in an automobile. Defendant was a contractor, doing the work of paving a public highway. The locus in quo was where a detour sign was placed upon a part of that paved roadway. The trial was upon count 4, declaring for the maintenance of the obstruction partly across the public highway, and the negligent failure—

“to have and maintain proper lights, signals or other warning of the presence of said barricade, plank or other obstruction across or partly across said highway at said point, and as a proximate consequence of said negligence,…

2Cases cited117 opinions

  1. Hans v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. In Re AyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  5. Poindexter v. GreenhowSupreme Court of the United States · 1885

112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. General Motors Corp. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Louisville N. R. Co. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  3. Johnson v. BattlesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  4. Hamilton v. BrowningSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  5. Dewey v. KellerIdaho Supreme Court · 1964

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API