United States v. Imperial Wall Paper Co.

The appraiser, in his special report, states as follows:

The merchandise in question is described on the invoice as pontisse de laine poudre and was, on examination, found to be wool ground into powder, to be used in the making of wall paper, and in the opinion of this office, not flocks as covered by paragraph 1105. It was accordingly returned for duty as a manufacture of wool not specially provided for at 50% under paragraph 1119 of the act of 1922. Sample forwarded to the Board of G. A.

The importation was returned by the local appraiser as a manufacture of wool not specially provided for,…