Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Vibradamp Corporation

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 11, 1968No. Calendar 21, Docket 51,791PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

The decisive facts appear comprehensively in the opinion below. 6 Mich App 713.

We said unanimously, in Mitchell v. Metal Assemblies, Inc. (1967), 379 Mich 368, 370:

“The sole question on review by the Court of Appeals, and in turn here, is ‘whether there is any evidence to support the award.’ Meyers v. Michigan Central R. Co., 199 Mich 134, 137, 138; Thornton v. Luria Dumes Co-Venture, 347 Mich 160, 162; Coates v. Continental Motors Corporation, 373 Mich 461, 467. ‘Our obligation is to accept, without question, findings that are certified here if there be any evidence whatever to sustain those…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Carter v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Thornton v. Luria-Dumes Co-VentureMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Meyers v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Coates v. Continental Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Klein v. Len H. Darling Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Kostamo v. Marquette Iron Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Deziel v. Difco Laboratories, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Hlady v. Wolverine Bolt Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Solakis v. RobertsMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Deziel v. Difco Laboratories. Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1975

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API