Legal Opinion

Klein v. Len H. Darling Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1922No. Docket No. 1PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Certiorari to Industrial Accident Board. Doris Klein, and another presented their claim for compensation against Len H. Darling Company for the accidental death of their decedent in defendant’s employ. From an order awarding compensation, defendant and the Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, insurer, bring certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

Otto Klein, husband and father of appellees, was in the employ of Len H. Darling Company, who manufacture separators for batteries. Part of his time he looked after the treating of wood separators. The treatment was accomplished by boiling the wood in a solution of caustic soda and sulphuric acid. Mr. Klein quit work January 3, 1920, and died on January 15, 1920. His widow wrote to the industrial accident board, and to defendant company to the effect that her husband died January 15, 1920, “from acid poisoning, from acid inhaled and absorbed on account of lack of proper ventilation equipment…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Paul v. . Travelers' Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Freeman v. Mercantile Mutual Accident Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  3. Hills v. BlairMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Reck v. WhittlesbergerMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Rayner v. Sligh Furniture Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Robertson v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Deziel v. Difco Laboratories, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Carter v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Burlington Mills Corp. v. HagoodSupreme Court of Virginia · 1941
  5. School District No. 1 v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API