Deziel v. Difco Laboratories, Inc.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
After Remand
Blair Moody, Jr., J.
We originally granted leave in these three cases and directed that they be argued and submitted consecutively because they all concern aspects of the same problem: when and under what conditions alleged mental disorders1 (including psychoneuroses and psychoses) are compensable under the Worker’s Disability Compensation Act of 1969 (the Act). 394 Mich 466; 232 NW2d 146 (1975).
However, after hearing extensive oral argu*10ments, examining the briefs and reviewing the record, and upon reading the opinions of both the referees'and Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Carter v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Van Dorpel v. Haven-Busch Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Zaremba v. Chrysler CorporationMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
- Deziel v. Difco Laboratories. Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1975
- Klein v. Len H. Darling Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by96 opinions
- Robertson v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2002
- Dunlavey v. Economy Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1995
- McGarrah v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Hurd v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. CephasSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.