Legal Opinion

Carter v. General Motors Corp.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1960No. Docket 20, Calendar 48,117PublishedCited by 94 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*580Souris, J.

Ordinarily, compensation under our workmen’s compensation act* is awarded for incapacity to work because of tbe crushing of a hand or foot, the inhalation of silicotic dust, or other similar injury arising out of and in the course of employment. Benefits are not awarded for the injury as such, but rather for the loss of earning capacity. Hence, even this Michigan Court, years ago, recognized the right of a claimant under the act to compensation for loss of such earning capacity caused by a mental or emotional disability resulting from a physical injury to claimant or even resulting…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Spade v. Lynn & Boston RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  2. Bailey v. American General Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Sheppard v. Michigan National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Burlington Mills Corp. v. HagoodSupreme Court of Virginia · 1941
  5. La Veck v. Parke, Davis & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by94 opinions

  1. Robertson v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Deziel v. Difco Laboratories, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Crochiere v. Board of Education of Town of EnfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  4. Pathfinder Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Wolfe v. Sibley Lindsay & Curr Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1975

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API