People v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHIN, J.
The Legislature has provided that when a felony case is dismissed because a magistrate or court granted a motion to suppress evidence, making the evidence insufficient, the prosecution may refile the case and relitigate the suppression motion. (Pen. Code, § 1538.5, subd. (j).) However, the Legislature has also provided that the relitigated motion “shall be heard by the same judge who granted the motion at the first hearing if the judge is available.” (Pen. Code, § 1538.5, subd. (p); see Soil v. Superior Court (1997) 55 Cal.App.4th 872 [64 Cal.Rptr.2d 319].) We granted review…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Solberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- People v. HullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. UhlemannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Snukal v. Flightways Manufacturing, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Miller v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- People v. PanahCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- In Re SteeleCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. SeijasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Peracchi v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. RivaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.