Legal Opinion

People v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 2002No. S099542PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

The Legislature has provided that when a felony case is dismissed because a magistrate or court granted a motion to suppress evidence, making the evidence insufficient, the prosecution may refile the case and relitigate the suppression motion. (Pen. Code, § 1538.5, subd. (j).) However, the Legislature has also provided that the relitigated motion “shall be heard by the same judge who granted the motion at the first hearing if the judge is available.” (Pen. Code, § 1538.5, subd. (p); see Soil v. Superior Court (1997) 55 Cal.App.4th 872 [64 Cal.Rptr.2d 319].) We granted review…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Solberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. People v. HullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. People v. UhlemannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Snukal v. Flightways Manufacturing, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Miller v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. People v. PanahCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. In Re SteeleCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. People v. SeijasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Peracchi v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. People v. RivaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API