Legal Opinion

Miller v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1999No. S073888PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

In 1990 the voters of this state enacted a constitutional amendment as part of Proposition 115 affirming that in criminal cases the people of the State of California have “the right to due process of law” (Cal. Const., art. I, § 29).1 In the present case, we consider whether the assertion of that state constitutional right by a district attorney can serve as a justification for holding a newsperson in contempt for refusing to surrender unpublished information, in spite of the newsperson’s immunity from contempt for such refusal expressly provided in article I, section 2,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Stein v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. James Steinle v. City and County of S.F.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  2. People v. AultCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Strauss v. HortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  4. People v. AultCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Clouse Ex Rel. Clouse v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2001

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API