Legal Opinion

People v. Seijas

California Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 2005No. S123790PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

In this case, a witness against defendant admitted at the preliminary hearing that he had originally lied to the police about the identity of defendant’s accomplice. Because of this, shortly before trial began, defendant’s counsel suggested that the trial court should appoint an attorney to advise that witness whether to assert the privilege against self-incrimination. The court did so. When the witness did assert the privilege, defense counsel argued that the witness should be given immunity for his testimony. Counsel also argued that if the witness were granted immunity,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. People v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. People v. HillhouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. People v. ZamudioCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  2. People v. PartidaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. People v. ChatmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. People v. ValdezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  5. People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API