Legal Opinion
Kane v. American Insurance
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 30, 1999No. AC 18210PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
At the joint request of the parties, the trial court granted a motion for reservation, pursuant to Practice Book § 73-1,1 to have this court resolve a question concerning the legal effect of General Statutes § 38a-341 (2).2
*499The following facts are relevant to the resolution of this appeal.3 The plaintiff, Bertha Kane, sustained serious injuries in an accident on October 13, 1995. Kane alleges that the accident was caused by a hit-and-run vehicle, although the defendant, American Insurance Company, contends that the accident arose from a slip and fall.
Kane had been insured by the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Majernicek v. Hartford Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Travelers Insurance v. HendricksonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1983
- Johnston v. American Employers InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Stenson v. Northland InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dibello v. Barnes Page Wire Products, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Kane v. American InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Attorneys Liability Protection Society v. Reliance InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2000
- Demchak v. StateConnecticut Superior Court · 2003
- Socci v. PasiakConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.