Legal Opinion

Socci v. Pasiak

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 1, 2009No. AC 30049PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The plaintiff Sara Socci 1 appeals from the trial court’s denial of her application for a prejudgment attachment of certain property of the defendant, Jeffrey S. Pasiak. 2 3 On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly found that payment of any judgment rendered against the defendant was secured adequately by insurance. We reverse the judgment and remand this matter to the trial court with direction to enter a prejudgment remedy order in the amount of $250,000.

The following facts and procedural history are relevant to the resolution of the plaintiffs appeal. On March…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. TES FRANCHISING, LLC v. FeldmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  2. Burton v. COM'R OF ENV. PROTECTIONSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  3. Marlin Broadcasting, LLC v. Law Office of Kent Avery, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  4. Clinch v. Generali-U.S. BranchConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  5. Connecticut Light and Power Co. v. GilmoreConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. Maurice M.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  2. Vincent Metro, LLC v. GinsbergConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  3. Taylor, L. v. Tenet, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API