Legal Opinion
Stenson v. Northland Insurance
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 16, 1996No. 14785PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDupont, C. J.
At the joint request of the parties, the trial court granted a motion for reservation1 to have this court resolve questions concerning the construction and application of General Statutes (Rev. to 1989) § 38-175Í.2
The parties stipulated to the facts that follow. The defendant issued Leroy Jordan a personal automobile *179insurance policy with a policy period running from 12:01 a.m., August 25, 1989, through 12:01 a.m., November 25, 1989. On or about October 23, 1989, a renewal offer was mailed to Jordan. Jordan renewed his policy for an additional three month period, extending coverage from 12:01…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- American Universal Insurance v. DelGrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Plourde v. LiburdiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Back v. Peoples National Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
- Eason v. Welfare CommissionerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Phelan v. EverlithConnecticut Superior Court · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kane v. American InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Office Furniture Rental Alliance, LLC v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
- Demchak v. StateConnecticut Superior Court · 2003