Legal Opinion

Crouch v. Shafer

California Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1917No. L. A. No. 3960PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Walter J. Horgan, Sam B. Dannis, and Conner, Heath & Maxwell, for Appellants.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

Defendant Shafer held the record title to the real property, ownership of which is here in controversy. Plaintiffs’ title rests upon a sheriff’s deed made after foreclosure of the lien of a street assessment upon this property, in which action the predecessor in interest of defendant Shafer was impleaded and served as a party defendant, suffered default and an adverse judgment. Defendants Campbell and Smith deraign title through a tax deed from the state antedating the lien of the street assessment.

Appellant Shafer’s contentions may be disposed of with brevity. His attack upon plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Crouch v. H. L. Miller & Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Emery v. KippCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Brush v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Smith v. FurlongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Campbell v. ShaferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sacramento & San Joaquin Drainage District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Andrews v. North Side Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Donian v. DanielianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. Penaat v. TerwilligerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Penaat v. TerwilligerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API