Crouch v. Shafer
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Walter J. Horgan, Sam B. Dannis, and Conner, Heath & Maxwell, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Defendant Shafer held the record title to the real property, ownership of which is here in controversy. Plaintiffs’ title rests upon a sheriff’s deed made after foreclosure of the lien of a street assessment upon this property, in which action the predecessor in interest of defendant Shafer was impleaded and served as a party defendant, suffered default and an adverse judgment. Defendants Campbell and Smith deraign title through a tax deed from the state antedating the lien of the street assessment.
Appellant Shafer’s contentions may be disposed of with brevity. His attack upon plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Crouch v. H. L. Miller & Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Emery v. KippCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Brush v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Smith v. FurlongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Campbell v. ShaferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sacramento & San Joaquin Drainage District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Andrews v. North Side Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1932
- Donian v. DanielianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Penaat v. TerwilligerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Penaat v. TerwilligerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944