Legal Opinion
Niles v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 6, 1903PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The demurrers interposed to the plaintiff's complaint were upon the ground that the facts stated therein were not sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
The allegations of the complaint are somewhat voluminous, but so far as they are necessary to present the question to be determined upon this review they may be summarized and stated in substance, as follows:
The plaintiff was a stockholder of the New York Northern Railroad Company, which owned and operated a railroad from its junction with the Manhattan railway, near 155th street, in the city of New York, to a point on the New York Harlem…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Gamble v. Queens County Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. New York & Northern Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Leslie v. . LorillardNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Flynn v. . Brooklyn City R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Maharaj v. Bankamerica Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Thomas A. Vincel v. White Motor Corporation and Glenn F. KommerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Maharaj v. Bankamerica Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- General Rubber Co. v. . BenedictNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Accounting of Parascandola v. National Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.