Legal Opinion

Adams v. Harrison

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 22, 1939No. Civ. 2310PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

This is an action for the recovery of secret profits claimed to have been made by the defendants through a real estate transaction. A jury brought in a verdict for $11,000 in favor of the plaintiff and the defendants have appealed from the ensuing judgment. The defendant R. E. Harrison, who will be referred to as the appellant, was a real estate agent in San Diego and practically the sole owner of two corporations named R. E. Harrison Co. and Rae Investment Company.

The respondent, who resided in Ohio, had met the appellant, during a visit to San Diego in 1921. On April 10, 1922, the appellant…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Philpott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Victor Oil Co. v. DrumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Evans v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Phelps v. GradyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. King v. WiseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ward v. TaggartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Sime v. MaloufCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. Rae v. CameronMontana Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Auer v. FrankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. BladeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API