Legal Opinion
Delmonico v. Laidlaw Waste Systems, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 2, 1992No. D013788PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WIENER, Acting P. J.
Plaintiff Anthony J. Delmonico sued Laidlaw Waste Systems, Inc., and Bruce Whittingham (collectively Laidlaw) on several theories seeking damages for having been wrongfully fired for refusing to participate in Laidlaw’s allegedly illegal practice of misleading customers and prospective customers into entering contracts for waste removal under false pretenses. Relying on Foley v. Interactive Data Corp. (1988) 47 Cal.3d 654 [254 Cal.Rptr. 211, 765 P.2d 373] the trial court granted Laidlaw’s motion for summary judgment. Delmonico appeals contending the court misapplied…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Hollister Convalescent Hospital, Inc. v. RicoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- JADE K. v. ViguriCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Tri-County Elevator Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Hammond v. CrabtreeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Eben-King v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Dakota Payphone, LLC v. AlcarazCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Ramon v. Aerospace Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1996
- Faunce v. CateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Sunset Millennium Associates, LLC v. Le Songe, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.