Legal Opinion
Ramon v. Aerospace Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 29, 1996No. B078776PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KITCHING, J.
Introduction
Appellant Jacob F. Ramon (Ramon) appeals from the grant of summary judgment in favor of respondent The Aerospace Corporation. We hold that Ramon’s notice of appeal was not timely filed within 60 days of service of the notice of entry of judgment pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 2(a)(2). After entry of judgment, a motion for reconsideration pursuant to section 1008 does not extend the rule 2 time period. We dismiss this appeal because it does not satisfy the requirements for appellate jurisdiction.
Appealability
Ramon’s notice of appeal purports to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hollister Convalescent Hospital, Inc. v. RicoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Blue Mountain Development Co. v. CarvilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Passavanti v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Eddy v. SharpCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Betz v. PankowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Coshow v. City of EscondidoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Day v. CollingwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- APRI Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Lofton v. Wells Fargo Home MortgageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Safeco Insurance v. Architeral Facades Unlimited, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.