Legal Opinion
Hammond v. Crabtree
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 20, 1992No. D013697PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BENKE, J.
Because we find the appellant’s notice of appeal was not timely filed, we dismiss her appeal.
Facts and Procedural Background
Appellant Virginia C. Hammond (Virginia) is the daughter of Genevieve N. Crabtree (Genevieve). Following Genevieve’s death on December 6, 1986, Virginia petitioned to probate a 1977 will and four later codicils executed by her mother.
Respondents Daniel B. Crabtree (Daniel) and Polly Crabtree (Polly) are Genevieve’s grandchildren. They filed a will contest in which they alleged the codicils were invalid because they were made as a result of undue influence…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hollister Convalescent Hospital, Inc. v. RicoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Wilson v. Los Angeles County Employees Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Tri-County Elevator Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Winter v. Linda D.California Court of Appeal · 1970
- National Advertising Co. v. City of Rohnert ParkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. HessNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
- Fergus v. SongerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Delmonico v. Laidlaw Waste Systems, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Mentzer v. HardoinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Sunset Millennium Associates, LLC v. Le Songe, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.