Legal Opinion

Neilsen & Co. v. Cassia & Twin Falls County Joint Class a School District 151

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided June 22, 1982No. 13664PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWANSTROM, Judge.

In 1975 the Supreme Court considered this ease for the first time. See Neilsen & Co. v. Cassia and Twin Falls County Joint Class A School District 151, 96 Idaho 763, 536 P.2d 1113 (1975) (hereinafter Neilsen I). In that opinion, the Court held that the School District violated I.C. § 67-2310 by awarding a building contract to a contractor who had listed a nonqualified mechanical subcontractor in its bid. The Court also held that Neilsen, the lowest responsible bidder, should be awarded damages incurred in bidding the contract. On remand the trial court allowed damages for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Minich v. Gem State Developers, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Paul Sardella Construction Co. v. Braintree Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  3. Sardella Construction Co. v. Braintree Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975
  4. Hall v. BlackmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Jensen v. ShankIdaho Supreme Court · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Czaplicki v. Gooding Joint School District No. 231Idaho Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Planning & Design Solutions v. City of Santa FeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Court Street Steak House, Inc. v. County of TazewellIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Dana, Larson, Roubal & Associates v. Board of CommissionersIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API