Legal Opinion
Planning & Design Solutions v. City of Santa Fe
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided October 25, 1994No. 21387PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FROST, Justice.
The City of Santa Fe (City) 1 solicited bids for a proposed-development. After the bids had been opened, the City introduced new criteria in evaluating the bids, then awarded the bid to the fourth-ranked bidder, and then rejected all bids. Planning Design Solutions (PDS), the top-ranked bidder, sued the City, alleging violations of the New Mexico Procurement Code and the City’s own purchasing regulations. The trial court ruled that PDS was entitled to damages for costs incurred in preparing the bid. We affirm.
I. FACTS
On April 15, 1992 the City published a “Request for…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United States v. CarmackSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Heyer Products Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
- Bourgeous v. Horizon Healthcare Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- City of Dayton, ex rel. Scandrick v. City of Dayton Mayor McGeeOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Weber v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Wilson v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re Carl Corp. v. State, Department of EducationHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
- Memorial Medical Center, Inc. v. Tatsch Construction, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
- Hunt v. Central Consolidated School DistrictDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2013
- Environmental Control, Inc. v. City of Santa FeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.