Macario v. Alaska Gastineau Mining Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from an order and judgment of the superior court for King county, Gilliam and Mackintosh, JJ., entered March 24, and April 7, 1916, quashing service-of summons, and granting a nonsuit, in an action for personal injuries sustained by an employee through, an explosion of dynamite.
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
— The plaintiff, Macario, commenced this action in the superior court for King county, seeking recovery of damages for personal injuries against the defendants mining company and O’Neill, which personal injuries he claims to have suffered as the result of the negligence of the defendants while he was employed by the mining company under the direction of O’Neill, its foreman, in its mining operations in Alaska.
The mining company is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of New York, and is engaged in mining operations in Alaska, being duly authorized to do business…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Green v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Simon v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Wabash Western Railway v. BrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Colorado Iron-Works v. Sierra Grande Mining Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1890
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Vicksburg, Shreveport & Pacific Ry. v. DeBowSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
- Pacific Typesetting Co. v. International Typographical UnionWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- International Shoe Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- State ex rel. Canadian Greyhound Lines, Ltd. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1946
- Alto v. Hartwood Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.