Legal Opinion

Alto v. Hartwood Lumber Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1925No. 18850. En BancPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

— The respondent, Alto, as plaintiff, brought this action in the superior court of Pacific county against the appellant, Hartwood Lumber Company, to recover in damages for personal injuries. There was a trial in that court before a jury, resulting in a verdict for the appellant. On motion of the respondent, the verdict was set aside and a new trial granted. The appeal is from the order granting a new trial.

The new trial was granted because of erroneous instructions given the jury. As the appellant confesses error in the instructions, and, as we ourselves think them plainly erroneous,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pacific Typesetting Co. v. International Typographical UnionWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Rich v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Smith Company v. DickinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Matson v. Kennecott Mines Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Macario v. Alaska Gastineau Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Crose v. Volkswagenwerk AktiengesellschaftWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State ex rel. Canadian Greyhound Lines, Ltd. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Ivy River Land & Timber Co. v. National Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. Cox v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  5. Lucas v. Luckenbach Steamship Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API